Comparison between the new measurements obtained in this paper and the old values reported in the literature for spin (top left) and inclination (top right). The bottom-left panel shows a comparison between 1 − anew and 1 − aold in logarithmic scale, to better highlight the differences in measurements where both the initial and final spin are nearly maximal.
All current measurements of BH spins in XBs, obtained through continuum fitting (orange) or relativistic reflection. Spin measurements obtained through relativistic reflection using measurements from NuSTAR are indicated in blue, while reflection measurements using data from other instruments are shown in yellow. The new measurements of this paper are shown in green. The sources are ordered in increasing R.A., and the values and references for all measurements are presented in Table 6. The arrows indicate upper or lower limits.
Left: the MAXI light curve in the 2–20 keV band of the 2022–2023 outburst of XTE J2012+381 (top). The following five panels show the evolution of the measured Galactic column density NH, the inner disk temperature and normalization of the diskbb component, the power-law index Γ, and the normalization of the powerlaw component, obtained when fitting the NICER spectra of the source with the model TBabs*(diskbb+powerlaw). The seventh panel shows the exposure of the NICER observations analyzed, and the eighth panel shows the reduced χ2 returned by the fits to the NICER spectra. Right: the evolution of the measured disk temperature of the source (top) and of the 1–10 keV flux (bottom) vs. the hardness defined as the ratio of the 5–10 keV flux to the 2–5 keV flux. In the top panel, we omitted the measurements with an uncertainty larger than 0.5 keV. The colors of the points are the same as in the left panels and represent the time evolution of the source.
Panel (a) shows the unfolded spectrum of Swift J1728.9–3613. The blue points represent the spectrum from the NuSTAR FPMA detector, while the red points show the spectrum obtained from the FPMB sensor. The solid blue and red lines show the total model to the FPMA and FPMB spectra, while the dashed and dotted lines show the contribution to the model by the diskbb and relxill components, respectively. Panel (b) shows the residuals in terms of σ for the constant∗TBabs∗(diskbb+powerlaw) model. The residuals show clear indication of relativistic reflection. Panel (c) shows the residuals of the best-fit model, constant∗TBabs∗(diskbb+relxill).
Top: Stacked 1.28 GHz MeerKAT image of G351.9−0.9, with white contours at 25 μJy × (−3, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15) σ. The radio color bar indicates the flux density scale in janskys. The Chandra position of Swift J1728.9–3613 is indicated with a filled blue circle.
Bottom: Finder chart showing the IR emission from ESO-VISTA of Swift J1728. The red circle represents a region of radius equal to 1farcs3, centered at the known position of the source. The image was composed by displaying the Ks band in red, the H band in green, and the J band in blue.
Histogram of the spin-inclination parameter space for the mtable{nuMLIv1.mod}∗constant∗TBabs∗(diskbb+relxill+Gaussian) model. In the lower left panel, the red, blue, and green contours represent lines of 1σ, 2σ, and 3σ. The top left and lower right panels show the 1D histogram of the parameters. The yellow line represents the median of the distribution and the red lines represent the ±1σ confidence limits of the median. The top right panel represents the spin-inclination parameter space for the models presented in Table 1. The black dashed line shows the maximum theoretical prediction for the spin of a black hole with a thin disk of 0.998 (Thorne 1974).
Top: Panel (a) shows the unfolded spectrum of XTE J1908+094 when fit with model 6, requiring an inclination >79°. The colors of the spectra match those described in Figure 3. The dashed line shows the contribution of the diskbb component of the model, while the dotted line shows the contribution of the relxilllp component. Panels (b) and (c) show the residuals in terms of σ of the fits using the high inclination and free inclination models, respectively. The χ2 of the model requiring a high inclination is ∼85 worse than the model that allows a free inclination. Note the increased residuals at ∼7.4 keV (indicated by the vertical gray line) in panel (b) when compared to panel (c), suggesting that the high inclination model overpredicts the shape of the blue wing of the Fe K line. Panel (c) is a copy of panel (d) in Figure 3.
Right: The hardness ratio throughout the two observations computed as the ratio of the 8–20 keV count rate to the 3–8 keV count rate, as a function of the total 3–20 keV count rate. The blue points represent the 2013 observation, while the yellow points represent the 2019 one. The horizontal dashed lines show the hardness cuts placed on the two observations to divide them into the "high hardness" and "low hardness" spectra. The light curves were binned so that each point represents 200 s.
Four BW light curves. Two periods are plotted; ϕB = 0 is at pulsar TASC (time of the pulsar ascending node). For J0952, photometry points during the "flare" at ϕB = 0.4–0.5 are not used in the fit. These are marked with open symbols. During the second cycle the error flags are omitted and the Isaac Newton Telescope (INT) r photometry is shown, for comparison.
Top: GMOS-N/NIRI/NIRC2 light curves. The data are phased to the ephemeris of Stovall et al. (2014), with ϕ = 0 at the pulsar ascending node; two periods are plotted for clarity. For the second period, the infrared points are the medians of the magnitudes during individual dither pointings. The model is an ICARUS direct heating fit to the data. Note the appreciable data fluctuations about the light curves, suggesting variability or finer substructure.
Right: Upper left panel: NIRC2 Ks image of PSR J0636+5128 (median of frames). Lower left panel: GMOS r image at maximum. Upper right panel: GMOS g image at maximum. Lower right panel: GMOS g image at minimum.
Ratio of data to model produced when using models that do not account for relativistic reflection to fit the FPMA spectra from the 6 existing NuSTAR observations of EXO 1846-031 (blue) and similar simulated HEX-P LET (orange) and HET (red) spectra. The NuSTAR observations were taken during the 2019 outburst of EXO 1846-031. The HEX-P spectra were simulated to have an exposure equal to the existing NuSTAR observations, using the best-fit parameters determined when fitting the NuSTAR spectra with models that do account for relativistic reflection. The increased energy coverage of HEX-P paired with its increased sensitivity at high energies enables stronger constraints on the underlying continuum emission, reducing the degeneracy with the reflected radiation, enabling placing stronger constraints on the physical properties of the system.